How Many Marketing Emails Should Your DTC Brand Send Per Month? Find Your Optimal Email Frequency.
tl;dr on how many emails you should send a month for your DTC brand
8 is the most common amount you can send to the same subscriber before you see greater diminishing returns, but it's greatly dependent on the type of products and list size. Calculations below.
Start with what you track already: Open rate × Click-to-open (CTOR) × Placed order % × AOV. That gives you revenue per delivered recipient (RPR) for a “fresh” send.
Subtract send cost (per sub / per send / CPM) and a small LTV penalty for people you lose to unsubscribes.
Chart gross vs. net and mark the tipping point where net is maximized.
The Email Marketing Frequency Problem Every DTC Brand Faces
If you run email marketing for a direct-to-consumer brand, this scenario sounds familiar: send more emails and revenue climbs... until it suddenly doesn't. Then unsubscribes creep in, spam complaints flare, deliverability dips, and your "more sends = more money" strategy falls apart.
The question every email marketer asks: What's the optimal email frequency for maximum revenue?
So we asked: can we stop guessing and measure the tipping point where net revenue is highest?
Turns out, yes. And it only takes a few inputs you already have.
Two anchors worth knowing:
Average inbox placement (deliverability) hovers ~86% globally—meaning ~1 in 6 legit marketing emails never hit the inbox. [1]
“Too many emails” is the #1 (or top-3) reason for unsubscribes in multiple studies. Frequency does bite. [2]
Optimal Email Send Frequency Calculator for DTC

If you want to jump straight to the punchline, you can use our free Optimal Email Send Frequency Calculator. You can put in all your inputs, tweak the dials, and see where the tipping point really is. If you're curious what the actual math behind it all is, then read on!
How the Email Frequency Model Works
We simulate one month with n sends to your active list:
1) Revenue mechanics
Base RPR (fresh send):
RPR₀ = Open × CTOR × Placed-Order(from click) × AOV
Fatigue / saturation:
RPRᵢ = RPR₀ × e^(−k·(i−1))
where k is your response decay (higher k = faster fatigue).Deliverability (inbox placement): start from a baseline (e.g., 0.85–0.95). If monthly complaint rate rises and crosses ~0.3%, apply a smooth penalty—light at first, harsher if you keep pushing. (That 0.3% threshold comes straight from Gmail’s bulk-sender rules/FAQ [3])
Delivered audience per send i:
Deliveredᵢ = Subsᵢ₋₁ × Deliverabilityᵢ
Revenue per send i:
Revᵢ = Deliveredᵢ × RPRᵢ
2) Risk & cost mechanics
Unsubs / complaints: baseline + a slope with frequency. Remove unsubs from the list for the rest of the month.
Send cost: pick Per subscriber, Per send (flat), or CPM—the tool converts to a comparable cost/sub view.
LTV loss:
(Total Unsubs) × LTV_per_sub
(profit, not revenue).
3) Net for n sendsNet(n) = Σ Revᵢ − Σ SendCostᵢ − LTV_loss
We sweep n = 0…40 and mark the peak. That peak is your “how many emails this month” answer—based on your inputs, not a generic rule.
Why this shape? Independent studies (Return Path/Validity and others) show engagement falls and complaints rise with frequency, and sender reputation drives inboxing—hence diminishing returns and a penalty once complaints climb. [4]
Calibrate it with your data
Fill the revenue box
Use last 3–6 months of campaign data to enter Open, CTOR, Placed Order %, AOV. The tool shows Derived RPR. If you already track revenue per delivered, that works too—same knob, fewer assumptions. (Sanity-check ranges with public benchmarks if needed.) [5]Set your response decay (k)
Compare send #1 vs #2 RPR for a typical month. If #2 is ~15–20% lower, k ≈ 0.16–0.22 is reasonable. (You can refine later.)Pick a deliverability starting point
If you don’t have seed-test/inboxing data, start 0.9–0.95 for healthy, opted-in lists. Global averages sit near 86%. [1]Mind the complaint line
Keep the threshold at 0.3% unless your program is stricter; Gmail’s own FAQ ties mitigation eligibility to staying below that line.Unsubs & complaints slopes
Use your ESP’s per-send rates as a base. Add a small slope as frequency rises. For guardrails, many ecommerce programs aim to keep unsubs < ~1% per send. [6]Costs + LTV
Choose a cost mode that matches your contract (per sub / per send / CPM). Add a conservative LTV per sub ($ profit). Even $3–$10 can shift the peak when unsubs climb.
Then look at the chart: gross vs. net with a tipping-point marker, plus a small “what moves the peak most?” panel so you see which assumption matters first (often decay, deliverability, or RPR).
The Email Frequency Sweet Spots by Volume
So… how many is "too many" emails in a month? There isn’t a universal number (sorry). But based on industry data and our model testing, patterns emerge:
2-4 Emails Per Month (Under sending)
Risk Level: Low
Typical Results: Revenue lift with minimal list churn
Best For: Conservative brands, high-value customers
4-7 Emails Per Month (Optimal sending)
Risk Level: Medium (watch zone)
Typical Results: Peak performance range for most brands
Watch For: Decay becomes visible, list churn matters
8+ Emails Per Month (Optimized sending)
Risk Level: High
Typical Results: Net revenue often flattens or declines
Requirements: Tight segmentation, complaint rates under control
If your complaints brush 0.3% or your unsubs spike, you’ve pushed too far for this month/segment. Pull back, rotate creative, or target more tightly.
A few practical tips that reliably move the peak to the right
Raise RPR: better offers/merch, cleaner copy, and more relevant targeting lift every send.
Lower decay: diversify message types and cadence per segment so #5 isn’t just #1 with new art.
Protect deliverability: stay under 0.3% complaints, monitor Postmaster Tools, pre-send test, and keep list hygiene tight.
Control cost: knowing your true cost/sub (even when you pay CPM or flat per send) makes decisions obvious.
Our free calculator also gives you insights dynamically on what will reliable move that peak up and to the right.
Citations
[1] https://www.validity.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/The-State-of-Email-in-2024-Keeping-Ahead-of-the-Curve.pdf
[2] https://www.zerobounce.net/email-statistics-report/
[3] https://support.google.com/a/answer/81126?hl=en
[4] https://www.litmus.com/blog/why-email-deliverability-matters
[5] https://mailchimp.com/resources/email-marketing-benchmarks/
[6] https://www.klaviyo.com/blog/7-ways-to-reduce-unsubscribe-rate

Nathan Snell
Cofounder
Related Posts
A tactical guide to ChatGPT-5's real-world performance for marketers - what works, what doesn't, and how to get better results today.
11
m read
GPT-5's arrival reshuffles the leaderboard in our DTC AI Benchmarks, but surprising winners emerge in DTC-specific tasks across our evaluations.
11
m read
Build a dynamic ecommerce marketing calendar with free AI prompts, templates, and holiday best practices. Align your channels dynamically (and no more static PDFs).
11
m read
Experience the Raleon Efficiency
Difference

